Dear students,
Entry 1 is about asking questions in this module, especially with the first 2 lectures that has passed. Now, while we are in our Help! Indonesia lesson series, please do take the time to 'level up' your critical thinking abilities. I believe critical thinking can be nurtured over time but you need to be more self-aware than what I am seeing in your 1st journal entry.
How can you be a more critical thinker? Here are some ways in brief:
1. Use “Wasted” Time.
2. A Problem A Day.
3. Internalize Intellectual Standards.
4. Keep An Intellectual Journal.
5. Reshape Your Character.
6. Deal with Your Ego.
7. Redefine the Way You See Things.
8. Get in touch with your emotions.
9. Analyze group influences on your life.
Please go to http://www.criticalthinking.org/articles/sts-ct-everyday-life.cfm and read up there. A critical thinker needs to start thinking before you can train yourself to be more critical.
Ask questions that will create new knowledge and understandings.
A resource website compiled by Mrs Madeline Lim-Chen. She previously taught at NUS High School and is now back in MOE as a Curriculum Resource Development Officer after 10 years of perplexing students with geographical inquiries. This is her personal website.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Help! Indonesia Project

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/products_data/images/SEASIA-SeismicHazards_Sep07.pdf
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/products_data/images/WIndoSH.pdf
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Assessment Rubrics for Help! Indonesia Project
Dear Litho students,
Please note the assessment rubrics for each watch centre aka groups.
Criterion:
Organization of information
Verbal techniques/ Presentation style
Design of presentation
Subject knowledge as demonstrated in presentation
Subject Knowledge and articulation as demonstrated in Q&A.
1 - Poor
2 - Average
3 - Good
4 - Very Good
5 - Excellent
Watch Centre that wins full funding: extra 6 points, partial funding: 3 points.
Regards,
Mrs Lim
It is possible to have an excellent presentation and 'score' full points, please do a good job regardless though.
Please note the assessment rubrics for each watch centre aka groups.
Criterion:
Organization of information
Verbal techniques/ Presentation style
Design of presentation
Subject knowledge as demonstrated in presentation
Subject Knowledge and articulation as demonstrated in Q&A.
1 - Poor
2 - Average
3 - Good
4 - Very Good
5 - Excellent
Watch Centre that wins full funding: extra 6 points, partial funding: 3 points.
Regards,
Mrs Lim
It is possible to have an excellent presentation and 'score' full points, please do a good job regardless though.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)